Archive for the ‘TILE Translations’ Category

Today’s Episode of “Personal Finance for Preschoolers”

Wednesday, May 18th, 2011

preschool-business.png
(photo credit: popofatticus)

Seems like the rash of recent economic disasters have woken America up to the fact that education in personal finance is practically non-existent in this country.

So financial educators are starting to pay more attention to the kids. (See, for example, SPEND.GROW.GIVE.) But there’s one little problem… For most kids, personal finance is, well, boring and irrelevant.

Sure, you can talk about it in an Elmo voice, but is that really going to make money matter to young children? And should personal finance education really start in preschool? Starting young probably can’t hurt, but you’ve also got to be smart about how you approach the topic.

What would be the best way for you to learn about personal finance?

What do you think you should know by now? Do you at least know where the money goes?

Anti-Trust Cops Anti-Nasdaq/NYSE Takeover

Tuesday, May 17th, 2011

policia.jpeg
(photo credit: banspy)

What happens when the two largest stock exchanges in the U.S. become one big mega-exchange? A monopoly, that’s what! In case you don’t remember from history or economics class (or the game Monopoly), a monopoly is when one company controls an entire market, making it hard or impossible for smaller companies to fairly compete. (The market, in this case, being the market of stock markets.)

That’s why anti-trust regulators at the Justice Department have shut down Nasdaq’s attempted hostile takeover of the New York Stock Exchange. The takeover is hostile because the NYSE already has a deal with German bank Deutsche Borse to be acquired for $10 billion, and it’s so not interested in starting a relationship with Nasdaq right now.

The New York Stock Exchange and Nasdaq have been competing for years, which keeps them both in customer-pleasing, price-cutting mode. Without that competition, NYSEasdaq could charge whatever it wanted and still crush what little competition would be left.

It could even become… too big to fail!

It’s the Enthusiastic Youngsters Who Will Be Fired First

Friday, May 13th, 2011

teachers-union.jpeg
(credit: kevindooley)

New York City Mayor Mike Bloomberg just announced a budget that will require 4,100 public school teachers to be laid off. That’s pretty tough news for a city with a challenging (to say the least) public school system. But what’s even tougher is the way those unlucky teachers will be chosen.

We’ve written about the last-in-first-out rule before (LIFO). In New York, the law says that teachers must be fired in reverse order of when they were hired. That means that an idealistic 24-year old with enough energy to start her career in an overcrowded, underfunded public school in the Bronx is more likely to be fired than an underperforming veteran.

What’s interesting is that many of the young teachers who are set to be laid off are actually participants in programs (like Teach for America and NYC Teaching Fellows) designed to bring new energy and drive INTO the public schools.

Well, there goes that idea. How do you think the public education system can be improved?

Is education a favorite cause of yours? Do you know what is? Visit Your Causes to start figuring it out!

Google Diversifies Its Empire…

Wednesday, May 11th, 2011

robot-army.jpg
(credit: Sougent Harrop)

…with robot cars!

We’re always prattling on about the importance of diversification around here. You know, the “don’t put all your eggs in one basket” philosophy, applied to your investment portfolio. (If you don’t believe us that a diverse portfolio is the way to go, take the Timing the Markets Challenge!)

Well the same principle can apply to all areas of life – baskets of eggs, for example, or Internet empires like Google’s. They’ve been branching out from their humble search engine roots for years (email, document sharing, voicemail), but now they’re taking it to the streets. With robot cars.

Robot cars, as you might imagine, are currently illegal on U.S. roads. But if Google does a good job lobbying the Nevada legislature, then Sin City may become the first market for automated overlords vehicles.

Hey, if the Internet implodes some day, at least they’ll have something to fall back on.

Online Shopping Gets Smarter [Than You]

Wednesday, May 4th, 2011


(credit: Unhindered by Talent)

Guess what? Retailers are getting smarter and smarter when it comes to separating you and your cash (or credit card info, to be more precise).

First there was members-only designer discount site Gilt Groupe, with time limits for checking out with your items. Then we saw the daily deals companies like Groupon and LivingSocial. There’s Rent the Runway, where you can rent a hot little piece of couture for an event for under $200.

And now, for a mere $30 monthly subscription fee, online shops like JewelMint will get to know your tastes and offer up pieces it’s sure you’ll like. All based on an algorithm. This is in some ways even cooler than the computer from Star Trek: The Next Generation that made Captain Picard all those cups of tea with a simple voice command.

The online shopping world will surely continue to evolve, getting cooler, more convenient, and quite a bit more manipulative in the process. So don’t forget to bring your brain when you go on your next online shopping spree.

Think you’re a conscious consumer? Take our Where Does the Money Go? challenge!

Even the Most Respected Investors in the World Make Mistakes

Wednesday, May 4th, 2011

doh-oops.jpeg
(credit: jmv)

You may not have heard yet, but there’s been some interesting drama in the house of the country’s most-worshipped investor – the Oracle of Omaha, Mr. Warren Buffet. One of the top execs at his company (Berkshire Hathaway) seems to have, well, cheated at the game. David Sokol looked like he was next in line to replace Buffet when he eventually retires. But then he pulled a little thing called insider trading.

He bought a bunch of shares in a company, and then convinced Buffet that Berkshire Hathaway should buy that company, which raised the price of the shares and made Sokol a tidy profit. Unfortunately for everyone, that’s illegal. (For the record, Sokol so far denies doing anything wrong.)

There are many ways the company could have handled it – they could have tried to cover it up, or denied the whole thing and given Sokol a big bonus. But to his credit, Berkshire’s famous leader just fessed up. At the company’s annual meeting, where company executives meet with investors, explain their decisions, and take feedback, Buffet basically said that his top aide had done a terrible thing. He also heaped some blame on himself, saying that he wasn’t skeptical enough when Sokol came to him with the proposal.

Now Sokol is out of a job and the company is moving forward. Easy as that. The truth is, bad things happen all the time. But in business as in the rest of life, all it really takes to make things right again is to take responsibility for what happened, fix what you can fix, and move on.

Holding Charities Accountable for Their Accounting

Wednesday, May 4th, 2011

schoolboys-afghanistan.jpeg
(photo credit: isafmedia)

“People like to read the books,” says Daniel Borochoff, president and founder of the American Institute of Philanthropy in Chicago. “But the expense statement tells a story, too. Not as entertaining, but perhaps just as revealing.”

This seems like an appropriate follow-up to yesterday’s post about operational costs… A prominent organization dedicated to building schools and increasing access to education in Afghanistan – the Central Asia Institute – has recently gotten some bad press about its alleged money mismanagement.

Well, not money mismanagement exactly… more like financial nondisclosure. State auditors, donors, and charity ratings organizations have been surprised to find that more than half the CAI’s annual budget was spent in the U.S. instead of being sent overseas to pay for bricks and pencils.

Now, no one’s being accused of embezzlement – but it does seem like, at the very least, the organization’s finances were pretty incompetently handled. This is a great example of why it’s so important to do your homework before you give. Most charities are required to make their financial statements public, and you can use sites like GuideStar.org to help you get a better picture of where a nonprofit’s money is really being spent.

It’s also a pretty good example of how important it is to be on top of your finances. Even if you’re a great person (or organization), someday you’re going to be held responsible for the money coming in and going out of your account. SPEND.GROW.GIVE. will help you keep track, but you can get involved by setting a budget and sitting down with your advisor to talk about where you want your money to go.

What happens when disaster aid organizations are destroyed?

Tuesday, May 3rd, 2011

Cullman-Alabama-EMS.jpeg
(photo credit: southerntabitha)

We’ve written before about how to give smart in the wake of a disaster, and unfortunately the situation just keeps coming up. While not as devastating as the earthquake and tsunami that devastated Japan in April, the string of tornadoes that tore up the American South last week has left hundreds dead and thousands homeless.

One of the pieces of advice we passed on is to stay thoughtful when you’re practicing “crisis philanthropy.” One way to do that is to focus your giving on organizations with a local presence in the affected area. But what if there are none left?

That isn’t exactly the situation in Tuscaloosa, but the Salvation Army – a local charity giant – lost two buildings in the tornado, both of which could have really helped with relief efforts. We thought this might be a good time to point out the differences between program costs and operational costs, which are the two types of expenses you’re funding when you write a check to your favorite charity.

  • - Program costs refer to money spent on the projects you hear about during fundraisers – feeding the poor, building temporary housing for flood victims. The exciting stuff.
  • - Operational costs (sometimes called overhead) refer to more boring stuff – the electric bill, the salary of the person who answers the phone, the new office downtown.

People tend to want their money to go to program costs because it makes them feel good about themselves. But in most cases, paying for operational costs is just as important. Who will administer lifesaving vaccinations if an organization can’t afford to pay clinic staff? And who knows how much more prepared local organizations could have been had they had the extra cash to spend on additional locations or a disaster preparedness program?

A Surprising Challenge to the Future of Solar and Wind Power

Wednesday, April 27th, 2011

solar-panels-in-snow.jpeg
(credit: Mike Weston)

According to the International Energy Agency, cutting carbon dioxide emissions in half by 2050 will require almost half the world’s energy to come from sustainable sources (like sun and wind, instead of oil and coal).

These alternative energy sources are getting cheaper and more popular in the U.S., but the New York Times has just revealed a little-known fact about the solar and wind energy we’re learning to love: it’s backed up by coal power.

That’s right. Because the sun isn’t always shining and the wind isn’t always blowing, energy from clean sources can’t consistently meet the needs of our power-hungry populace. So when output dips on the wind farms, it has to be supplemented by old-fashioned power sources.

And the power plants of yesteryear just aren’t built for that kind of one-and-off output. The bottom line: Either alternative energy has to advance to the point of not needing supplementation, or traditional power plants need to spend a lot of money updating their equipment.

We wonder… could there be some financial incentive that would get the old energy companies to play nice with the new ones?

If sustainable energy is your thing, make a statement. Start your Mission Statement in Learn to Give.

A Refreshing New Wall Street Scandal

Wednesday, April 27th, 2011

Raj-Rajaratnam.png
(credit: REUTERS/ Shannon Stapleton)

Ah, spring! Baby birds stretch their wings, trees release deadly spores, and Wall Street awakens from its long post-Ponzi slumber. You know, Ponzi. Scheme. Ponzi scheme. Madoff?

This guy.

But we digress. Today’s news is about Raj Rajaratnam, the founder of a successful hedge fund called Galleon Group. He’s been accused of insider trading – this is, unfairly using information from outside sources in order to make a big profit for his company (and himself).

Here’s what you need to know about Bernie and Raj:

  • 1. Madoff has already been tried, convicted, and sent to prison for 150 years. Raj is just on trial – and he’s still innocent until proven guilty. If he is proven guilty, though, he’ll be in the clink with Bernard for up to 25 years.
  • 2. Madoff ran a Ponzi scheme – he collected money from new investors and handed much of it over to existing investors, calling it a return on their investment. In other words, he just moved the money around instead of investing it. It involved a huge network of people, funds, customers, billions of dollars, and many, many handshakes.
  • Galleon Group is accused of insider trading by using a small network of tipsters from different companies. These tipsters [allegedly] shared valuable corporate secrets with Galleon, and Galleon [allegedly] used that information to make a killing on the trading floor. All very fine line behavior.

What would you do if someone gave you valuable information about a potential investment win?