Archive for the ‘Grow Page’ Category

Google Diversifies Its Empire…

Wednesday, May 11th, 2011

robot-army.jpg
(credit: Sougent Harrop)

…with robot cars!

We’re always prattling on about the importance of diversification around here. You know, the “don’t put all your eggs in one basket” philosophy, applied to your investment portfolio. (If you don’t believe us that a diverse portfolio is the way to go, take the Timing the Markets Challenge!)

Well the same principle can apply to all areas of life – baskets of eggs, for example, or Internet empires like Google’s. They’ve been branching out from their humble search engine roots for years (email, document sharing, voicemail), but now they’re taking it to the streets. With robot cars.

Robot cars, as you might imagine, are currently illegal on U.S. roads. But if Google does a good job lobbying the Nevada legislature, then Sin City may become the first market for automated overlords vehicles.

Hey, if the Internet implodes some day, at least they’ll have something to fall back on.

Even the Most Respected Investors in the World Make Mistakes

Wednesday, May 4th, 2011

doh-oops.jpeg
(credit: jmv)

You may not have heard yet, but there’s been some interesting drama in the house of the country’s most-worshipped investor – the Oracle of Omaha, Mr. Warren Buffet. One of the top execs at his company (Berkshire Hathaway) seems to have, well, cheated at the game. David Sokol looked like he was next in line to replace Buffet when he eventually retires. But then he pulled a little thing called insider trading.

He bought a bunch of shares in a company, and then convinced Buffet that Berkshire Hathaway should buy that company, which raised the price of the shares and made Sokol a tidy profit. Unfortunately for everyone, that’s illegal. (For the record, Sokol so far denies doing anything wrong.)

There are many ways the company could have handled it – they could have tried to cover it up, or denied the whole thing and given Sokol a big bonus. But to his credit, Berkshire’s famous leader just fessed up. At the company’s annual meeting, where company executives meet with investors, explain their decisions, and take feedback, Buffet basically said that his top aide had done a terrible thing. He also heaped some blame on himself, saying that he wasn’t skeptical enough when Sokol came to him with the proposal.

Now Sokol is out of a job and the company is moving forward. Easy as that. The truth is, bad things happen all the time. But in business as in the rest of life, all it really takes to make things right again is to take responsibility for what happened, fix what you can fix, and move on.

A Refreshing New Wall Street Scandal

Wednesday, April 27th, 2011

Raj-Rajaratnam.png
(credit: REUTERS/ Shannon Stapleton)

Ah, spring! Baby birds stretch their wings, trees release deadly spores, and Wall Street awakens from its long post-Ponzi slumber. You know, Ponzi. Scheme. Ponzi scheme. Madoff?

This guy.

But we digress. Today’s news is about Raj Rajaratnam, the founder of a successful hedge fund called Galleon Group. He’s been accused of insider trading – this is, unfairly using information from outside sources in order to make a big profit for his company (and himself).

Here’s what you need to know about Bernie and Raj:

  • 1. Madoff has already been tried, convicted, and sent to prison for 150 years. Raj is just on trial – and he’s still innocent until proven guilty. If he is proven guilty, though, he’ll be in the clink with Bernard for up to 25 years.
  • 2. Madoff ran a Ponzi scheme – he collected money from new investors and handed much of it over to existing investors, calling it a return on their investment. In other words, he just moved the money around instead of investing it. It involved a huge network of people, funds, customers, billions of dollars, and many, many handshakes.
  • Galleon Group is accused of insider trading by using a small network of tipsters from different companies. These tipsters [allegedly] shared valuable corporate secrets with Galleon, and Galleon [allegedly] used that information to make a killing on the trading floor. All very fine line behavior.

What would you do if someone gave you valuable information about a potential investment win?

Saudi Arabia Reacts to Your Disinterest by Playing Hard to Get

Thursday, April 21st, 2011

oil-barrels.jpg
(photo credit: ezioman)

Let’s see if we can explain this one:

- The laws of supply and demand say that when supply of a particular product is low, its price goes up. And when consumer demand for that product is high, prices also go up.

- The opposite is also true: low demand = low prices; high supply = low prices.

- So when the oil minister of Saudi Arabia says that OPEC is cutting down on oil production because there’s too much supply in the market, you would think that oil is pretty cheap right now.

Nope. The price of oil is actually higher than it’s been in two and a half years. But it’s not high because of strong consumer demand (apparently demand is quite low since no one can afford it), and it’s not because of low supply (the minister says the market is actually “oversupplied” with barrels and barrels of black gold).

The price of oil is high because of the investors trading it on commodity markets. Because of all the civil unrest/ revolutions/ humanitarian disasters in North Africa and the Middle East right now, they’re worried about whether oil will become harder to get in the future.

So in this case, the price of oil has nothing to do with present-day supply and demand. It’s about a bunch of analysts who think that if a lot of oil-rich governments collapse, tomorrow’s supply might not meet tomorrow’s demand. (Dun dun dun dunnnnnnnnnn!)

Rut-Roh: Credit Rating Agency Just Not That Into U.S. Debt Right Now

Wednesday, April 20th, 2011

thumbs-down.jpg
(photo credit: striatic)

Well, that pesky federal deficit has finally caught up with us. Standard & Poor’s, a credit rating agency that basically judges how risky (or safe) it is to invest in a country, has officially said that the United States’s economic shenanigans may end up costing it its pristine AAA credit rating. (That’s three A’s, so you know it’s extra awesome.) The main reason? Washington’s seeming inability to agree on a plan to reduce the deficit.

S&P didn’t actually downgrade America’s credit rating, but it did change its “outlook” from “stable” to “negative.” This is basically a shot across the bow, or a warning from your mother that if you keep hanging out with those corner boys all you’ll get is a reputation.

This is kind of a big deal. If the U.S. is downgraded (and according to S&P is could be within three years), we’ll be out-credited by France. And foreign investors might be less interested in buying Treasury bonds, which would cut off an important source of income for the government. Which might result in more cuts to services like health care, education, and, you know, repairing roads.

Let’s see where we are in two years. In the meantime, how do you think you would do in S&P’s eyes?

Can you weather the credit storm?

Lessons From the Crash: Frank Murtha, Market Shrink (2 of 4)

Monday, April 18th, 2011

Frank Murtha is a psychologist with MarketPsych who specializes in investor behavior. Or misbehavior. Or misconceptions. Well, all of that. His job is to study how people make decisions with their money, and to help us understand (and avoid) common mistakes.

He stopped by to talk to us about how a crashing stock market changes the way investors invest. (Hello, recession of 2008!) Pretty interesting stuff. Check it out:

>> TILE brings you exclusive opinions, explanations, and interviews from experts in every industry. Have a burning question or an expert you’d like to see interviewed? Just Ask TILE!

Debt and the Presidents of the United States

Friday, April 15th, 2011

If you’ve ever watched the news, you probably know that every problem facing our nation is all one person’s fault: the president.

Well, that’s probably not fair.

This neat-o infographic shows the net worth of every U.S. president and the national debt when they entered and left office. It’s a great perspective during this particular time of budget crisis and finger-pointing.

Do you see any patterns? Is the federal deficit tied to a president’s money-management skills? Wealth? Or something entirely different (like, uh, wars and recessions)?

presidents-and-debt.png
(via credit sesame)

If we need more money, why can’t the government just print more?

Dilbert Creator Says “B Students” Should Skip Math Class and Sell Candy in the Cafeteria Instead

Thursday, April 14th, 2011

If you’ve ever felt like certain school subjects just aren’t your thing, read this essay by Dilbert cartoonist Scott Adams.

He tells the story of how he learned to run a business by simply going out and doing it. He didn’t need to be an expert in anything in order to be an entrepreneur; he just used little bits of different talents he already had, he failed a lot, and he kept trying.



(He apparently hasn’t heard that Algebra II is the key to success.)

Seems like every piece of advice ever tells us that the only way to accomplish anything is by trying to do something. Keep that in mind when your campus lemonade stand is crushed by a competitor. At least you’ve done something.

And next time, you may be the ruthless competition-crusher!

Check out some real-life class-cutting capitalists.

How to Stick to Your Values and Be Popular at the Same Time

Thursday, April 14th, 2011

ben-jerry.jpeg

It’s hard for anyone to stay true to themselves when they’re pulled in a million different directions by their adoring fans. (See: every celebrity breakdown in history.) But it’s especially hard when you’re a publicly-traded company.

Publicly-traded companies have a legal obligation to put the interests of their shareholders first. And often that means making money the fast and easy way instead of the most ethical way.

But there are actually two ways to judge a company’s success: the bottom line tells you how much money the company has made. The triple bottom line tells you how much good the company has done – for people and the planet – while it made that money. As a socially-responsible investor, you can choose to put your money behind companies that focus on the triple bottom line, which benefits shareholders AND the rest of the world.

Learn more about socially-responsible investing (SRI).

There’s a great opinion piece in the NYTimes that talks about how good companies can navigate the complicated world of hostile takeovers and shareholders’ rights while still staying true to their mission and values. For example, Ben & Jerry’s ice cream company, because of its obligation to shareholders, was forced to sell to an international corporation (Unilever). While the acquisition didn’t totally destroy the company’s founding principles, it sure wasn’t the same company after that.

What would you have done if you were Ben (or Jerry)?

Socially Responsible Investing (SRI) is…

Tuesday, April 12th, 2011

Socially responsible investing connects your interests and personality to your financial resources. When you invest in a socially responsible way, you ensure that your portfolio earns a competitive rate of return while also making a positive social and environmental impact. For example, you might invest in companies that have good employee relations, diversity in the workplace, a commitment to clean air, or that use sustainable forms of energy.

Companies are deemed socially responsible by research firms such as Calvert, Social Funds, and KLD Research & Analytics. They evaluate a company on its level of social responsibility based on the quality of its social, environmental, and governance (management) policies.

So how do socially responsible investors find a company they want to invest in? They use a process called screening, which considers whether or not a company’s values align with their own. For example, some investors screen out companies that pollute, that abuse their workers, or that produce harmful products like cigarettes.

Once you’ve found a company you like and decide to invest, you become a shareholder of that company. At socially responsible companies that means you stay involved and informed in the goings-on of the business. This is because socially responsible management is committed to keeping shareholders in the loop, and shareholders are encouraged to be involved corporate management.

Socially responsible investing is also called mission-based investing, sustainable investing, ethical investing, green investing, responsible investing, and value-based investing.