Archive for the ‘Grow Page’ Category

Who Owns Facebook?

Friday, March 4th, 2011

who-owns-facebook.jpg

i.e., Who’s profiting from your news feed addiction?

Facebook isn’t publicly-traded, which means you can’t buy stock in the company on any stock market. But it seems to have found plenty of well-heeled investors without reaching out to the great unwashed masses (i.e., us).

Family Investors? More Like Donors.

Wednesday, March 2nd, 2011

“Experts generally advise entrepreneurs to ask for an amount that their loved ones can afford to never get back, and say the recent recession is in some cases proving this point.

‘The reality is most companies do not succeed,’ says William D. Bygrave, a professor of entrepreneurship at Babson College who co-wrote a 2010 study on the expectations and motivations of informal start-up investors, including family, friends and strangers.

Dr. Bygrave’s findings show that about half of such investors anticipate a positive return on their investment, while the other half expect to lose part or all it. ‘The closer the relationship between an entrepreneur and an investor, the lower the expected return,’ his research concludes.”

What do you think?

If you borrowed money from a family member for a business venture, how likely would you be to pay it back? Would you sign a formal agreement or try to keep the loan “casual?”

“Woooah There, Economy!”

Wednesday, March 2nd, 2011

apartment-buildings-china.jpeg
(photo credit: Jakob Montrasio)

China’s economy was on fire even as the rest of the world melted down into a financial puddle. But growth like that can’t last forever, and economic officials are starting to hose down the beast before it gets out of hand.

  • China’s Premier, Wen Jintao, is about to unveil the nation’s next 5-year economic plan, and it seems like there are some serious changes in store for the people of the People’s Republic.
  • Massive growth in the last 30 years brought heavy pollution, widespread corruption, and greater income inequality than ever before. And most of the growth relied on selling goods overseas, which left the local economy underdeveloped.
  • Premier Wen says that the government’s new economic goals are to avoid inflation and restructure the economy so that it doesn’t rely so much on exports. Policies will also try to address the inequality that resulted from billion-dollar industries springing up overnight.
  • Shifting resources to the local economy may mean slower growth, but it may also result in a lot more jobs, as the new service industry can employ more Chinese than factories can.

Facts & Figures

  • China is changing its annual GDP growth target from 7.5% to 7%
  • Over the past 30 years, the annual GDP growth rate has been around 9%
  • Between 2000 and 2009, employment grew by less than 1%

Best Quote

“We’ll never seek economic growth rate and big size at the price of environment. That would result in unsustainable growth featuring industrial overcapacity and intensive resource consumption.” – Premier Wen

What do you think?

If China devotes less of its economy to manufacturing and exporting cheap goods, do you think prices will rise here in the U.S.?

What the Unemployment Rate Really Means

Wednesday, March 2nd, 2011

When they say the U.S. unemployment rate is 9%, does that mean that only 9% of all possible American workers are out of a job?

Nope. The official unemployment rate doesn’t count people who have given up looking for a job. It also doesn’t include people considered “not in the labor force,” like students. And it definitely doesn’t tell you much about the millions of people who are working part-time but can’t find full-time work. (They’re called the “underemployed.”)

Contrary to popular belief, the unemployment rate has nothing to do with how many people are applying for or receiving unemployment benefits. The Bureau of Labor Statistics collects data by actually going out and asking people about their employment status.

Click the chart for Matt Berger’s explanation.

How do you fit into this chart?

Screening is…

Tuesday, March 1st, 2011

Screening is the way you evaluate potential investments based on certain criteria.  While the criteria is different for different objectives (for example, respect for human rights when looking for socially responsible companies or low price-earning ratios for value stocks), the process of making the list smaller based on specific criteria is the same.

Screening is an integral part of socially-responsible investing (SRI). It refers to the way you evaluate potential investments based on certain social, environmental, and good corporate governance criteria. When you screen companies for social responsibility, you’re checking to make sure that they have respectable employee relations, strong records of community involvement, excellent environmental impact policies and practices, respect for human rights around the world, and safe and useful products.

Peter Thomas: The Secret To Basically Everything is Passion

Friday, February 25th, 2011

We found Peter Thomas hanging around at the Global Student Entrepreneur Awards while we were at the New York Stock Exchange this October.

Peter is a really wise and motivational guy. Here he talks about how following your gut (or your passion) is key to living a happy, successful, and prosperous life.

(You can watch the whole GSEA recap video here. To see all of SPEND.GROW.GIVE’s GSEA interviews, click here.)

Americans Suddenly Remember They Have Savings Accounts

Thursday, February 24th, 2011

“The recession that just rocked the U.S. economy happened in part because Americans were borrowing and spending more than they could afford. Now, three years after the downturn began, families are moving faster than many analysts had expected to put their finances in order by paying down debt and boosting their savings.”

What do you think?

Are you saving more? Spending less? Do you think saving is good for the economy?

Midwest Workers To Governors: We’re Not Paying For Your Deficit

Thursday, February 24th, 2011

wisconsin-union-protest.jpg
(photo credit: marctasman)

State governments around the country are facing serious budget deficits, and something needs to be done. But unionized workers in Wisconsin, Ohio, and Indiana are pretty sure that that something shouldn’t include eliminating their right to organize.

  • Republican-sponsored bills in the three states propose to chip away at budget deficits by limiting or eliminating the power of private and public-sector workers to unionize.
  • Most of the bills would curtail the right to collective bargaining. This is the process by which a group of employees in a particular company or industry can negotiate with business owners for better pay, improved working conditions, or greater job security (among other things).
  • Collective bargaining was critical to reform in an era when children worked in factories and most workers were glorified indentured servants. Today, opponents say it’s unnecessary and costly. Supporters argue that without it, they are at risk of the same historical abuses that led to the union movement in the first place.

Facts & Figures

  • The Wisconsin bill would save the state an estimated $300 million over two years
  • The state’s budget deficit for that period is approximately $3.6 billion
  • Tens of thousands of protesters have packed the capitals of the three affected states in recent weeks
  • In Wisconsin, Democratic legislators actually fled the state to prevent the budget bill from being passed

Best Quote

“Governor Kasich decided he wants to squash unions and found a creative way to do it, but he has to realize that we’ve fought this battle before and he will not stop us because we will fight to the very end.” – JoAnn Johntony, President of the Ohio Association of Public School Employees

What do you think?

Are unions still necessary? Do you know anyone who is a member of a union?

Is limiting the right to collective bargaining a good long-term solution for these states, or a quick fix?

Get to it!

Union disagreements aren’t limited to factory workers, firefighters, and public school teachers. Check out Amy’s explanation of a potential strike of NFL players here.

The NYSE Is Worth Less (and More) Than You Think…

Thursday, February 24th, 2011

nyse-1909.jpg
(credit: jarapet)

How a marriage of two stock exchanges illustrates the modern revolution in stock trading.

  • The New York Stock Exchange – famed hall of capitalist drama – has just been acquired by a German company called Deutsche Boerse. The result will be a giant international company with stock exchanges in Lisbon, Paris, Amsterdam, Brussels, New York and Frankfurt.
  • The way people trade stocks has totally transformed as technology has changed. Most trades these days are executed by computers with almost no human involvement. Since computers are smaller and cheaper than human traders, it’s possible for more small exchanges to exist, and that means more competition for giants like the NYSE.
  • The NYSE still operates a real trading floor with real people, making it ancient by today’s standards. Fewer companies are bothering to even get listed on the NYSE. This merger is an attempt by the exchange to stay competitive in an increasingly crowded industry.
  • Still, the trading floor, the opening bell, and that building on Wall Street are worth something. In fact, according to the latest valuation, they’re worth about $10 billion.

Facts & Figures

  • The NYSE has been on Wall Street since 1792, when 24 merchants traded stocks under a buttonwood tree (you know, back when there were trees on Wall St.)
  • The new company formed by the merger will be 60% owned by Deutsche Boerse
  • High-frequency trading (a.k.a. computer trading) accounts for about 70% of all daily trades

Best Quote

“The exchange business is really a computer business these days.” – Charles Jones, Professor at Columbia Business School, former visiting economist at the NYSE

What do you think?

Did you know that stock exchanges like the NYSE are themselves publicly-traded, for-profit companies?

How much does a name brand influence your decision to buy (or invest)?

Get to it!

Thinking about investing in stocks? Take our Risk Assessment Quiz to see how much equity you can handle.

Even if Mom is still doing your laundry, you can always make graphs

Tuesday, February 22nd, 2011

Even if the graphs are, oh, maybe just a little misleading. Take this one, for example. It appears to say that the reason certain European countries are in worse financial shape than others is because more of their men want to stay at home playing videogames.

See? Italy, Greece, Spain, and Portugal are over there on the right, with more of their menfolk living with the parents. And, conveniently, those same countries rank high on the riskiness (a.k.a. sovereign risk) of their government bonds (a.k.a. sovereign debt).

If he lives with his parents, you might want to think twice. About buying his government’s debt. (via The Economist)

But in case your statistics teacher hasn’t drilled this into your heads yet, correlation is not causation. This is a real-world example of that. Just because you can make a chart with a nice line on it doesn’t necessarily mean that one factor causes the other. Think about this:

  • The % of men living with their parents may be another way of describing the % of men who are unemployed (or underemployed). That would certainly be a factor in a country’s financial health.
  • Adult kids living with their folks might be due to a really expensive housing market, which is another factor in a country’s financial situation.
  • The countries with the highest % of men living with their parents all have cultural traditions that encourage kids to stay with their parents until they marry, or sometimes even after.
  • Ireland doesn’t have this culture of stay-at-home-til-you’re-40, but their bonds are still considered risky investments. If you just focus on the red line, you might miss this important point.

In conclusion:

  1. Correlation is not causation
  2. Think before you reblog
  3. If you can’t do either of those things, at least read the comments