Archive for the ‘Give Page’ Category

Hot? Take Off Your Suit!

Wednesday, June 1st, 2011
hawaiian-shirt-friday.jpg

(photo: Lazurite on flickr)

Remember those frigid winter mornings when Dad would tell you to quit whining already and put on a sweater if you were so cold? Well if you haven’t figured it out by now (which, duh), he was trying to save energy (i.e. money) by keeping the thermostat low.

Today, the Japanese government is doing essentially the same thing. But… kookier.

They’re pushing a new program called “Super Cool Biz.” Participating companies are encouraged to save energy by keeping their thermostats set to 82 degrees Fahrenheit this summer. After all, the nation is still trying to manage with reduced energy availability after some of its nuclear power plants were destroyed in the tsunami. But a nice side effect will be lower electricity bills for participating companies and a smaller carbon footprint for the entire nation.

The super cool part? Shorts, sandals, and Hawaiian t-shirts are all suddenly upgraded to “business casual.” We want pictures of super cool board meetings.

How are you staying cool this summer without contributing to a scorched earth?

American Philanthropy

Tuesday, May 31st, 2011

Welcome to American Philanthropy! The charity scene has changed quite a bit in the past 100 years – from the elite ranks of oil barons to the democracy of text donations. Learning a little about the history of philanthropy in the U.S. will help you understand the present and future  – and make you a smarter philanthropist.

Sexism is…

Tuesday, May 24th, 2011

Sexism is discrimination against a person or persons on the basis of gender. Like racism, it can occur explicitly (violence against women, demeaning comments), unconsciously (unintentionally excluding female coworkers from after-work dinners and casual meetings), or institutionally.

A Minimum Wage is…

Tuesday, May 24th, 2011

A minimum wage is the absolute minimum amount of money that someone can be paid for a specified job. It was created to ensure that no one is unfairly compensated for their work. As of July 2009, the federal minimum wage is $7.25 per hour.

In the U.S., the minimum wage is regulated by the federal agency called the Department of Labor, but states have the flexibility to set their own higher (or in special cases, lower) minimum wage. There are also exceptions to who must receive the minimum wage. Waiters and other workers who regularly receive tips have a much lower minimum wage ($2.13/ hour). And sometimes employers can pay workers who are under 20 only $4.25 per hour for their first 90 days on the job.

Would you like a tax write-off with that sandwich?

Friday, May 20th, 2011

panera-interior-2.jpg
© 1999-2011 Panera, LLC. All rights reserved

“The lesson here is most people are fundamentally good,” [Panera founder and Chairman Ronald] Shaich said. “People step up and they do the right thing.”

The “right thing,” in this case, is choosing to pay the full retail price (or more) for a bagel at one of Panera Bread’s pay-what-you-want restaurants. These locations are nonprofit, and “prices” are actually just suggested donations. Any money left over after paying the utility bills and workers’ salaries (i.e. overhead) goes to Panera’s charitable foundation.

This is genius for two reasons:

1. Amazing PR for Panera

2. Combining hunger and peer pressure to make people donate to your charity

Seems like it’s getting easier every day to spend money. Is this the new philanthropy? Are $10 text donations just the start? Anything that gets people to donate more money to good organizations is progress in our book.

You have to wonder, though. Is this kind of giving the way you really want to spend your donation dollars? Impulse giving is kind of like impulse shopping – it will probably make you feel good about yourself at the moment (especially if you just ate a delicious sandwich), but it doesn’t usually reflect who you are or where your values lie.

And it definitely goes against the sage advice to do your homework before you give someone your money.

It’s the Enthusiastic Youngsters Who Will Be Fired First

Friday, May 13th, 2011

teachers-union.jpeg
(credit: kevindooley)

New York City Mayor Mike Bloomberg just announced a budget that will require 4,100 public school teachers to be laid off. That’s pretty tough news for a city with a challenging (to say the least) public school system. But what’s even tougher is the way those unlucky teachers will be chosen.

We’ve written about the last-in-first-out rule before (LIFO). In New York, the law says that teachers must be fired in reverse order of when they were hired. That means that an idealistic 24-year old with enough energy to start her career in an overcrowded, underfunded public school in the Bronx is more likely to be fired than an underperforming veteran.

What’s interesting is that many of the young teachers who are set to be laid off are actually participants in programs (like Teach for America and NYC Teaching Fellows) designed to bring new energy and drive INTO the public schools.

Well, there goes that idea. How do you think the public education system can be improved?

Is education a favorite cause of yours? Do you know what is? Visit Your Causes to start figuring it out!

Holding Charities Accountable for Their Accounting

Wednesday, May 4th, 2011

schoolboys-afghanistan.jpeg
(photo credit: isafmedia)

“People like to read the books,” says Daniel Borochoff, president and founder of the American Institute of Philanthropy in Chicago. “But the expense statement tells a story, too. Not as entertaining, but perhaps just as revealing.”

This seems like an appropriate follow-up to yesterday’s post about operational costs… A prominent organization dedicated to building schools and increasing access to education in Afghanistan – the Central Asia Institute – has recently gotten some bad press about its alleged money mismanagement.

Well, not money mismanagement exactly… more like financial nondisclosure. State auditors, donors, and charity ratings organizations have been surprised to find that more than half the CAI’s annual budget was spent in the U.S. instead of being sent overseas to pay for bricks and pencils.

Now, no one’s being accused of embezzlement – but it does seem like, at the very least, the organization’s finances were pretty incompetently handled. This is a great example of why it’s so important to do your homework before you give. Most charities are required to make their financial statements public, and you can use sites like GuideStar.org to help you get a better picture of where a nonprofit’s money is really being spent.

It’s also a pretty good example of how important it is to be on top of your finances. Even if you’re a great person (or organization), someday you’re going to be held responsible for the money coming in and going out of your account. SPEND.GROW.GIVE. will help you keep track, but you can get involved by setting a budget and sitting down with your advisor to talk about where you want your money to go.

What happens when disaster aid organizations are destroyed?

Tuesday, May 3rd, 2011

Cullman-Alabama-EMS.jpeg
(photo credit: southerntabitha)

We’ve written before about how to give smart in the wake of a disaster, and unfortunately the situation just keeps coming up. While not as devastating as the earthquake and tsunami that devastated Japan in April, the string of tornadoes that tore up the American South last week has left hundreds dead and thousands homeless.

One of the pieces of advice we passed on is to stay thoughtful when you’re practicing “crisis philanthropy.” One way to do that is to focus your giving on organizations with a local presence in the affected area. But what if there are none left?

That isn’t exactly the situation in Tuscaloosa, but the Salvation Army – a local charity giant – lost two buildings in the tornado, both of which could have really helped with relief efforts. We thought this might be a good time to point out the differences between program costs and operational costs, which are the two types of expenses you’re funding when you write a check to your favorite charity.

  • - Program costs refer to money spent on the projects you hear about during fundraisers – feeding the poor, building temporary housing for flood victims. The exciting stuff.
  • - Operational costs (sometimes called overhead) refer to more boring stuff – the electric bill, the salary of the person who answers the phone, the new office downtown.

People tend to want their money to go to program costs because it makes them feel good about themselves. But in most cases, paying for operational costs is just as important. Who will administer lifesaving vaccinations if an organization can’t afford to pay clinic staff? And who knows how much more prepared local organizations could have been had they had the extra cash to spend on additional locations or a disaster preparedness program?

Strategies for Change, Part 3: Direct Service

Monday, May 2nd, 2011

Welcome to our new series, showing you how the changes you want to see in the world actually happen!

Check out our other SfC shorts:

Strategies for Change: Introduction
Strategies for Change, Part 1: Activism
Strategies for Change, Part 2: Advocacy
Strategies for Change, Part 4: Education

A Surprising Challenge to the Future of Solar and Wind Power

Wednesday, April 27th, 2011

solar-panels-in-snow.jpeg
(credit: Mike Weston)

According to the International Energy Agency, cutting carbon dioxide emissions in half by 2050 will require almost half the world’s energy to come from sustainable sources (like sun and wind, instead of oil and coal).

These alternative energy sources are getting cheaper and more popular in the U.S., but the New York Times has just revealed a little-known fact about the solar and wind energy we’re learning to love: it’s backed up by coal power.

That’s right. Because the sun isn’t always shining and the wind isn’t always blowing, energy from clean sources can’t consistently meet the needs of our power-hungry populace. So when output dips on the wind farms, it has to be supplemented by old-fashioned power sources.

And the power plants of yesteryear just aren’t built for that kind of one-and-off output. The bottom line: Either alternative energy has to advance to the point of not needing supplementation, or traditional power plants need to spend a lot of money updating their equipment.

We wonder… could there be some financial incentive that would get the old energy companies to play nice with the new ones?

If sustainable energy is your thing, make a statement. Start your Mission Statement in Learn to Give.