Archive for the ‘Public Home Page’ Category

Top Ten Reasons Why TILE Charities Rock

Tuesday, January 5th, 2010

Happy 2010 from TILE’s Give blog!

Today we’re happy to share with you TEN reasons we’re proud to call these organizations our partners…

  1. 1Sky brought together the force of more than 168,000 citizen advocates and 3,200 small businesses this year to fight for bold climate and energy policy.
  2. Accion was ranked one of the top micro-finance institutions by experts in a study conducted by Philanthropedia this fall, and Accion CEO Michael Schlein was named one of the year’s “Most Influential in Business Ethics.”
  3. charity: water helped over 1 million people gain access to clean and safe drinking water. They started 1,145 new freshwater projects; 200 of them located at schools and 26 at health clinics.
  4. Global Fund for Children gave $1,193,500 to projects run by small community-based organizations working with some of the world’s most vulnerable children in 49 countries around the globe.
  5. Mapendo continued its life-changing work of helping refugees in their efforts to find stability and safety. Munewar and Lana, Darfur refugees who trekked a thousand miles from Darfur to Nairobi with their four surviving children, found refuge when Mapendo connected with them and facilitated their resettlement in St. Louis, MO.
  6. Millennium Promise partnered with GoodAdds.org and GE to launch a new online network that gives people the opportunity to directly support community projects in the Millennium Village of Ruhiira, Uganda.
  7. Project Health‘s co-founder & CEO, Rebecca Onie, was awarded the MacArthur “Genius” Fellowship for her “exceptional creativity, promise for important future advances based on a track record of significant accomplishment, and potential for the fellowship to facilitate subsequent creative work.” Congrats Rebecca!
  8. Rainforest Action Network got Gucci and other fashion industry leaders to stop bagging Indonesia’s rainforests.
  9. Stand for Children awarded Dakotah Keys a Beat the Odds Scholarship, an award honoring three high school seniors in Oregon every year who have succeeded despite daunting personal obstacles.
  10. Witness‘ global platform for human rights media and action, The Hub, had over 8 million visitors!

We can’t wait to see the important social change these organizations accomplish in the new year… stay tuned, and as always, stay informed!

- Gita

Today at TILE… The Subtleties of Competitive Advantage

Monday, December 21st, 2009

Today at TILE we continued to talk about the tensions that exist within economies. When does one player have a competitive advantage over the other? Does it always make sense to widen the gap if you are the one with the edge? How does the disadvantaged player close the gap?

In the context of today’s headlines, there are a few examples of how competitive advantage (and disadvantage) plays out in the economy. For example, the dynamics between developed and developing nations in Copenhagen climate talks, between Wall Street banker pay and the national unemployment rate, and TARP versus non-TARP firms.

Did you notice that the developing countries staged a walk-out in Copenhagen to protest the lack of cooperation they perceived coming from the developed countries? In essence, they were saying, “you enjoyed economic growth without any constraints on energy use… so either let us do the same, or compensate us for the new rules.” On the other hand, the developed countries, in general, said “we are only willing to sacrifice so much.” In this context, there is a greater good involved – fighting climate change – that can and should drive each side to find a middle ground. Nonetheless, the “haves” are not always willing to make enough of a sacrifice to incentivize the “have nots” to change the game.

There also seems to be tension between Wall Street and the unemployed. While Wall Street looks to be doling out record bonuses this year, many average Americans are still suffering through a drastic period of high unemployment rates. This “standoff” between the two groups plays out in Washington, DC, where we will find out who has the most influence in shaping government rules and regulations. Wall Street is lobbying for more freedom, more tax breaks, and less intrusion. Main Street is asking for help in the form of loans to small businesses, job creation, and social services.

We also see competitive advantage play itself out in the TARP versus non-TARP firms. Those companies that have paid back TARP funds are less encumbered by government oversight (e.g. on compensation and capital). This means they can compete more easily in the marketplace for talent and deals (because they can pay more competitively). In order to overcome this competitive disadvantage, firms like Citigroup and Wells Fargo went to market in a rush this week, selling large amounts of equity at discounted prices in order to pay back their bailout funds. Traditionally, selling at a huge discount is not something you would do unless you felt you were at a serious competitive disadvantage.

What is most important is simply to recognize that more often than not, countries, companies, and individuals do not compete on a level playing field. The perception of strength will dictate strategy. Remember that story about the turtle and the hare? At the same time, if the player who is at a disadvantage thinks there is no chance to compete or catch up, they may just walk away – and that might not necessarily be the best outcome in the long run for anyone. Think about it: consumers benefit from increased competition (better products, better prices) and citizens benefit from countries’ desire to have a cleaner planet.

What does this mean for the TILE Community? In economics it is really important to consider positioning – advantaged or disadvantaged. Do the companies you have in your portfolio have a specific advantage over others in their industry? Is that a part of your investment decision process? On a personal level, what advantages do you have over others? Is it always the best strategy to make that gap wider, or are there times when you might help others that are looking to reach a similar goal? Appreciating the tensions will help you find the best strategy – in the world of finance and in life.

- Amy

Today at TILE… Climate Change and Copenhagen

Wednesday, December 9th, 2009

Today at TILE we talked about the economics of climate change. What does the climate summit at Copenhagen mean for our global approach to climate change? Why can’t businesses, in general, see the impact they have on the environment? Why aren’t they more enthusiastic about switching to a greener model?

In economics, we talk a lot about supply and demand – the push and pull tension between what is available and what consumers want. In the area of climate change, tension is a constant because a lot of the conversations hinge on energy supply and demand. There is tension between developed nations and less developed nations, between traditional business metrics and “greater good” metrics, and between short-term and long-term outcomes.

Developed nations such as the U.S. and U.K. grew prosperous, in part, by using economically cheap yet environmentally costly fossil fuels. In fact, during America’s industrial boom, steel towns like Pittsburgh used to have “blackouts” during the day from all of the coal in the air. Developing nations point to this and claim that they should not be restricted by the rules more developed nations are trying to impose (like carbon reduction) yet did not observe in their own development. Another argument points out that while nations like China emit more carbon than the U.S. in total, Chinese individuals pollute far less than Americans do. Some statistics showing the climate footprint of an individual in the U.S. (19.78 tons of carbon emitted per person per year) versus China (4.58 tons), highlight the imbalance and the tension between developed and developing nations. (U.S. Energy Information Administration)

There are also international tensions between traditional definitions of “business good” and “greater good.” Businesses measure success with financial metrics – and climate metrics can often get in the way of profit! Businesses aren’t interested in (or rewarded for) sacrificing money in the bank today for cleaner air tomorrow. So it oftentimes takes legislation to influence corporate change. For example, if the international community takes a unified stance to increase restrictions on how much coal a company can use, it may limit production and increase the cost of their product in the short term. But it could also ensure that all companies around the globe are operating on a level playing field and mean a better, more healthy world tomorrow. Right now, what we see is that most businesses are driven by short-term instead of long-term considerations, but negotiations in Copenhagen will seek to create new rules both for how nations address climate change and how businesses operate.

So, are we at a point where we can change the game? Can we live in a world where countries, companies, and people think in terms of a “double bottom line” – economic growth balanced with longer term environmental rewards that benefit everyone? Lately, there are more and more examples of companies that “get it.” Stonyfield Farms is not only an incredibly profitable company but has been able to uphold an ambitious organic, environmental, and social mission even after its sale to Groupe Danone. In fact, it has begun to successfully spread these values into the larger organization. Consumers have started to vote with their wallets and demand more sustainable products and suppliers. Some corporate giants have heeded the call and begun to switch the way they do business. Carrotmob, on the other hand, is a web-based network of consumers that encourages local businesses to compete with one another for making the most socially responsible decisions. The reward for the winner is a “mob” of happy paying customers.

I hardly have to ask what this all means for the TILE Community. The youth of the world have the most to win or lose from this issue and it is important that you recognize the power you have right now. Nothing will change if you just talk about it. Take action – there is a lot you can do. First, vote with your wallet. Money is the most immediate way to communicate to companies that your demand for responsible products should lead them to increase supply. Second, consider investing in companies that practice a double bottom line. Your advisor can help you identify the companies that work for you and your portfolio. In essence, you’ll start to reward those companies by creating more demand not just for their product but also for their stock. Finally, be open to make those short- and long-term tradeoffs in your own life. It may be tough to push back against your high-carbon lifestyle at first… but there so much at stake.

- Amy

Welcome to TILE’s Give Blog!

Tuesday, December 1st, 2009
This week, we’re trying something new: Gita Drury, our Give expert, will be blogging about philanthropy, TILE Causes, upcoming events, and ways to get involved with the issues you care about. Feel free to email Gita with any questions or ideas you have. Please enjoy our inaugural post!

There’s been a lot of talk about the Millennium Development Goals (MDG) at TILE recently – have you heard about them yet? Spearheaded by the United Nations, the MDG consist of eight important and ambitious objectives for ending extreme poverty in developing nations around the world by the year 2015. These are:

  • End Poverty and Hunger
  • Provide Universal Education
  • Gender Equality
  • Child Health
  • Maternal Health
  • Combat HIV/AIDS
  • Environmental Sustainability
  • Global Partnership

Three of our TILE Cause organizations are working to make these goals a reality:

  • Millennium Promise‘s entire mission and programmatic work is based around accomplishing the MDG. The Millennium Villages project is their flagship initiative.
  • charity: water has pledged to educate 5 million people about water issues in the next six years.
  • Acción provides the world’s poor with financial tools they wouldn’t otherwise have access to, so they can literally work their way out of poverty.

Despite having distinct missions, leadership, and programmatic work, these organizations are all working in tandem to support the larger mission of the MDG.

There are MDG-related events happening all over the world over the next year. The most recent one took place on November 27th and 28th, when the Namibian Presidential Elections were held. This was the fourth general election since independence and the fifth democratic election Namibia has seen.

Stay tuned for more updates on MDG events!

And don’t forget, SPEND.GROW.GIVE. members can always check out Millennium Promise, charity: water, and Accion’s Give pages to learn more about how to support their work!

- Gita

Today at TILE… Holiday Shopping Madness!

Wednesday, November 25th, 2009

Today at TILE we talked about Black Friday, the biggest shopping day of the year. Why are people willing to spend the day after Thanksgiving shopping in a way they don’t during the rest of the year? Why join the consumer insanity… or why choose not to? In a season based on being thankful and generous, is this the only way to spread your holiday cheer?

Even though it isn’t officially in the holiday calendar, Black Friday – the Friday following Thanksgiving – seems to be one of the largest non-holiday “holidays” of the year. Stores create a ton of incentives for individuals to brave the crowds. They offer special deals and sales (buy more, not less), access to the hottest products (before they jump off the shelves), and a “you’ll miss out if you don’t join the fun” mood. While the objective is basically commercial (or business-focused), Black Friday has become a very sentimental and exciting day for many.

This year in particular, businesses want and need to see people in stores. Even though the expected number of holiday shoppers is estimated to increase to 134 million from 128 million a year ago, the overall holiday season spending is expected to fall 1% to $437.6 billion (The National Retail Federation). This means individuals are spending less per purchase and businesses are competing for a larger piece of a smaller pie. While overall sales have slipped a notch, consumers seem to be taking advantage of low prices and Black Friday is becoming more important. According to market research firm IBIS World, sales over the weekend will reach almost $43 billion or 3% higher than last year. That means that 10% of all holiday spending is happening in the weekend following Thanksgiving!

What if going shopping on Friday isn’t your thing? Maybe you’d rather just sleep in? Eat leftovers? Head to the gym? Or finally finish that paper? Admittedly, no one at TILE is planning on shopping that day either. Mostly citing a desire to stay away from huge crowds… and a tendency towards habitual holiday shopping procrastination! That being said, there was a general feeling in the office that we like it when friends and family “think outside the box” as a means to spread cheer and say thanks. Specifically, as a team we’re encouraging one other to consider alternative gift giving – maybe a donation to a favorite cause? Volunteering time together? Some of our Give Causes even devote sections of their sites to gift ideas. You may consider giving one of the “Little Black Boxes” from charity: water.

At the end of the day, we all have so much to be thankful for – friends, family, and so many opportunities to do so many things. At TILE, we are thankful to be involved with a good business that is also a good cause – with great people who show up every day. What are you thankful for? How will you spend your holiday? Just remember, if you’ve waited until the last minute to go shopping… giving is just a click away.

- Amy

Today at TILE… Mastering the Art of the Budget

Wednesday, November 18th, 2009

Today at TILE we talked about budgeting. Why does that word, at first glance, bring an uneasy feeling to the pit of your stomach? Why do budgets matter? What are the key ingredients for a successful budget? And how amazing does it feel when you figure it out?

Budgeting is a hard topic for everyone, young and old alike. Like the many excuses we come up with for avoiding exercise, there are some common themes in the budget battle: Cash is too hard to track; I’m not sure I really need a budget; Are the benefits of budgeting even worth all the work? To get over those hurdles, it is important to remember that a budget, especially at the beginning, is just about tracking what you do – not about setting limits or making immediate changes. To get started, you need: 1) the right mindset (understanding, not change); 2) a system to do it (a spreadsheet or your SPEND.GROW.GIVE. account); 3) a way to track cash (maybe an iPhone app, or a tiny notebook tucked into your bag); and 4) a willingness to look through a few months’ worth of data. Once you find a rhythm (just like exercise) you will find it is hard not to do it!

The next step is to appreciate that you may not get a clear picture of your spending habits right away. There are also going to be times when keeping track of every single purchase feels overwhelming and like too much of a struggle. Here are a few ways to think about budgeting that will keep you sane:

  • It’s A Challenge… The Good Kind. Can you look at the process as a personal challenge? When you consider that taking control of your budget is empowering, you’ll probably dread it less.
  • Finding Trends. Three days’ worth of spending data doesn’t make a budget. The most useful information comes when you can recognize the patterns or trends in your spending across weeks, months, or seasons.
  • Expense Buckets. You can probably tell the difference between a fixed expense (“Need to Have”) and a variable expense (“Nice to Have”). If you start feeling overwhelmed by all of your transactions, start by separating your expenditures into these two buckets, as it could make your decision making and understanding of trends easier. That being said, only you will know if weekly mani-pedis are in the “Need to Have” bucket!
  • Flexibility. Be nice to yourself. If you misplaced a receipt or a didn’t track a few cash purchases, that’s okay. Make a general category called “Other” in your budget. As long as the majority of your expenses don’t end up here… you’re doing just fine.

So why do all this work? Mostly because it keeps you more informed. Rather than scratching your head at an overdraft fee, you’ll know what to expect in advance. You can also have much richer conversations with advisors and funders about your needs today and in the future. Even more, a budget helps define long term goals like vacations, large purchases, the percentage of your income that goes to charity each year, and your investment goals. It makes you more responsible and more adult. For example, what does it mean to your budget to take one job versus another? Buy or rent one apartment over another? Achieve true financial independence from your family?

Think back to when you were a little kid and started saving for a special toy. Do you remember the feeling of pride when you added money to the piggy bank? Knew exactly how much you needed to save up in order to convince mom to take you to the toy store? Or finally saved enough? These early experiences really illustrate what a budget can do for you. It can help you make more informed choices. It can mean there is more money to invest… and more to give. It can mean taking that trip you always wanted to take. But mostly a budget is one of the best tools for teaching the essential life lesson of making choices. When you make informed and smart decisions, independence and empowerment go hand-in-hand.

- Amy

Today at TILE… Voicing Your Opinion

Tuesday, November 10th, 2009

Today at TILE we talked about voicing our opinions. Have you ever had something to say, but weren’t sure that anyone cared to listen? Have you thought you had a great point to make, but weren’t sure where (or how) to make it? Ever feel like today’s leaders don’t consider the next generation’s voice when making decisions?

According to the 2007 World Bank Development Report, “Parents do not represent the views and aspirations of young adults as they do those of younger children. Yet youth may still lack the opportunities or self-confidence to represent themselves in public fora. Young people need to be encouraged to participate more fully in public life. And governments and other agencies need to learn to communicate with young people, make their programs attractive to them, and deploy the immense talents of youths as partners in service delivery.”

The Young Global Leaders of the World Economic Forum are trying to answer that call. This group of 30 and 40ish types (young by traditional standards) is taking part in the “Global Redesign Initiative.” The goal of the initiative is to move leaders beyond words, to action – with a focus on six specific topics:

  • Mitigating Global Risks & Addressing Systematic Failures
  • Creating a Value Framework
  • Ensuring Sustainability
  • Strengthening Economies
  • Building Effective Institutions
  • Enhancing Security

Recognizing that young people have an interest in the future of the world, amazing insights, and few meaningful outlets to share their thoughts, the Global Redesign Initiative is looking for your input. Armed with your comments and feedback, the initiative will move leaders to action. So if you think you can redesign the world, now is your chance to stand up and be heard. Share your ideas over the month of November and they will be presented to global leaders at the World Economic Forum in Davos at the end of January. Join the online conversation at: http://taskforce.tigweb.org/ygl_youth.

What does this mean for the TILE Community? First, it is important to recognize that it takes more than just having a point of view. Let yourself go further, take initiative, and participate. Admittedly, it isn’t always easy to find ways to engage – but this is an example of a group that really wants to hear what you have to say. As we mentioned in our September 22nd post on “The Power of Networks,” communities are a great way to help people take action. Second (relating all this to personal finance), remember that benefits and responsibility go hand in hand. It is one thing to have financial means and it is another to take responsibility for understanding your money and putting it to good use (spending, growing, and giving). The more you practice empowering yourself (taking action) the more you will realize how amazing it feels.

If there are terms within the discussion topics you don’t understand, look them up in the TILE Library. And if you still have questions, ask us. We want to be a place for you to come and learn and ask the questions you can’t ask anywhere else. So try lending your voice to the Global Redesign Initiative – sharing your opinions on an issue you care about is a great place to start building the kind of future you want to live in.

- Amy

Today at TILE… Strong Dollar? Weak Dollar?

Wednesday, October 28th, 2009

Today at TILE we asked about the recent weakness of the U.S. dollar. What does that even mean? Who determines the “strength” of our currency? What is the relationship between the strength or weakness of the dollar and the value of the things you buy? And why is it important when it comes to our standing in comparison to the rest of the world?

A “strong” dollar means that you can get a lot for your money, or that it has a higher value relative to other currencies. A “weak” dollar means the opposite: it takes a lot of greenbacks to purchase a smaller amount of foreign currency. Let’s say you went to England to study abroad for a semester. Hypothetically, when you arrived and exchanged your money, you were able to receive 1 British pound for every $2 you exchanged; but by the time you left, you could purchase 1 pound for just $1.60. In this situation, the dollar has gotten stronger and the pound has gotten weaker.

Since we know that currencies don’t lift weights, how does that strength change? In the U.S., the Federal Reserve (“the Fed”) determines the interest rate paid when people borrow money. To a certain extent, this impacts demand, or how likely someone is to decide to buy or invest in U.S. dollars versus another country’s currency. In addition, the U.S. Treasury determines the amount of money that is printed or in circulation, and this determines supply. We are currently printing lots of money (high supply) and paying a low interest rate for borrowing (high demand) – both are inflationary measures chosen with the desire to get consumers to start spending.

While the Fed and the Treasury determine the environment, the current exchange rate is determined by the market based on expectations for future interest rates and the amount of money in circulation.
When thinking about the value of the dollar to you, it is helpful to think about it in two ways: First, what can you purchase with a dollar within your own economy? Second, what can you purchase with that same dollar from other economies?

We can think about how much a dollar buys using jeans as an example. Let’s say you need a new pair. You might want to consider the cost of American-made jeans versus a hot European brand. When the U.S. dollar is stronger, those foreign brands don’t cost as much. However, when the dollar is weaker, it takes more dollars to purchase them. The same can be true for items that require imported raw materials. If it costs more for an American company to import coffee beans, then the cost of that latte in the morning will definitely be higher!

At present, the dollar is viewed as weaker than it was in the not-too-distant past. As the Economist magazine pointed out this week, foreign currencies are appreciating quickly – the value of the Euro has gone up 20% versus the dollar since March. But what’s more important than the current strength of our currency is that the rest of the world believes in our economy – that the government will stand by its financial commitments. We can view the fluctuation in the dollar’s strength as a kind of rebalancing, and an acknowledgment that policies, especially across economies, markets, and governments, change and are constantly in flux.

At the same time, it is important to think about the relationship of the dollar’s strength or weakness to the economy as a whole. A deliberate decision to “weaken” our currency can have a lot of positive benefits. It makes our exports – the products we make here and sell abroad – more affordable for foreign buyers. This is good for many companies that employee Americans to manufacture products for export. For example, it may make a car buyer in Europe choose to buy American since it costs less. In addition, non-U.S. products are more expensive here at home – perhaps leading consumers to buy American. The more American companies see sales increase, the better it is for our economy (e.g. jobs, income, etc.) Kind of complicated, yet very deliberate strategy and thinking.

So what does this mean for the TILE Community? In the immediate, you may want to start checking prices when you go to the store to buy a new pair of jeans or this year’s winter coat. Are the fancy European brands more expensive today than they were a few months ago? If the answer is yes, it could be because the dollar got weaker, the exchange rate shifted, and the cost to purchase non-U.S. products has gotten more expensive. With a weak dollar, you may think about buying American. And if you do, your purchase could get you a little more than a new pair of jeans: spending your money on American-made products stimulates local companies and encourages them to invest more, hire more, and produce more products in the future. Looking beyond what is happening in the store, what you do with your everyday purchasing power impacts the economy more than you think. So who knows? Buying a pair of locally-manufactured jeans today may not only save you a pretty penny, it might create a job for you in the future!

- Amy

Today at TILE… Executive Pay

Monday, October 19th, 2009

Today at TILE we talked about the most recent uproar over executive compensation. How can some firms be contemplating record compensation while so many people are out of work? Is it a good thing if executives make a lot of money? A bad thing? And is it possible to have a conversation about this hot topic without yelling?

Last week, a few investment banks (well, technically they are bank holding companies, but they still act like investment banks because they don’t really lend money to businesses), announced their quarterly earnings. During these announcements, they identify how much money they’ve put aside for compensation. The bank that has been taking the most heat lately is Goldman Sachs, which has already set aside $16.7 billion in the first nine months of the year. To put that number into context, that’s approximately $700,000 per employee! In 2007, they paid out approximately $20 billion in compensation and in 2008 it was a little over $10 billion. But how can these banks be flirting with record compensation when the economy is so bad and after taking so much money from the government less than a year ago? Why doesn’t some of that cash go back to the taxpayer?

Admittedly, this is a heated conversation. Those in favor of high executive compensation point out that incentives can be a good thing. If individuals are motivated by the promise of high compensation, they will work harder to generate more revenue for their companies and that will benefit the larger economy. Goldman, for example, said they would be giving an extra $200 million to charities this year. They argue that limiting how much companies can pay their top-performing employees will hurt innovation, cause these individuals to leave, and (an extreme point) that it is against a capitalistic way of life.

Critics, on the other hand, ask, “how much is enough?” and “does it seem right that the same organizations that accepted government assistance are now paying out record bonuses?” In business, we often look at relative pay: how much an employee makes compared to peers at other companies (what can I make if I take my services elsewhere?) and how much does one job pay versus another. Our friends at GOOD magazine recently held a contest for people to visually express those comparisons for CEO pay. You can take a look here. These graphics bring up some interesting questions. Some contestants included the comparison, “what else could that money buy?” Try to understand both sides of the argument and then form your own opinions.

Personally, I am all in favor of incentive systems that encourage innovation, differentiate those who produce, and support a growing economy. That being said, it feels different this time. Although many of the banks have paid back the direct “loans” from the government, there are still indirect ways the government helped these firms weather the storm that it hasn’t been paid back for. Financial institutions like Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan were able to reduce the cost of borrowing debt because the government pledged collateral for them. It’s kind of like if you wanted to borrow your friend’s car and they only lent it to you because your parents said they would buy them a new car if you smashed his or hers up. That benefit, which saved banks hundreds of millions of dollars, fell to the bottom line (and to bonus numbers) instead of going back to the taxpayer. Most businesses expect a return when they help someone – why shouldn’t the government do the same?

What does this mean for the TILE Community? Well, as you get closer to that time when you pay your own taxes, everything the government does with its budget (taxpayer money) impacts how much you will pay (or not pay). If you feel strongly about more or less regulation, let your Senator, Congressman, and friends know about it. The topic is especially hot right now, as Obama is about to go out and rally support for increased government oversight in this and other areas. Now is a really important time to say what you think because the regulations and laws being set today will make a big difference in your future.

- Amy

Today at TILE… Savings, Small Banks, and You!

Tuesday, October 13th, 2009

Today at TILE we talked about how people are saving more, yet banks are continuing to go out of business. If people are putting more money in banks and banks are lending less, why are they still failing? Shouldn’t more money in the banks mean a more stable economy?

You’d think extra savings would make sense, but so far this year, 98 (mostly small) banks have failed. That’s because the health of a bank isn’t only determined by the amount of money people save or how much it has locked away in the safe. It depends on a few key factors: the quality of the bank’s loan portfolio (what they lent to other people or businesses in the past), the amount of money they can currently loan to generate new business (which creates revenue or earnings), and, yes, the amount in the bank.

A bank’s loan portfolio is basically the assets on the bank’s balance sheet. The loan decisions made in the past can either prove to be good ones or bad ones. Let’s imagine you spent some money on seeds to plant a vegetable garden, with the expectation of selling the vegetables at the end of the season for a profit. Towards the end of the summer, you realize that the seeds were bad, or maybe you just didn’t take proper care of them. You try to salvage them, but unfortunately, no matter how much fertilizer and water you throw on, a bad seed is a bad seed – and you wind up losing money. Without any revenue or earnings, you can’t go out and grow your vegetable business and you may even see your plot of land absorbed by a more experienced gardener!

This is how a lot of small banks feel right now. The difference is that the “bad seeds” in their case are really bad loans for commercial real estate development (think about all those empty strip malls). According to Foresight Analytics, half of the industry’s $1.8 trillion in commercial real estate loans are held by small and medium sized banks – and those banks represent just 15% of the total banking industry. In other words, the small banks hold a very high percentage of bad seeds.

Another important factor is the amount of money banks can loan out in order to earn revenue. Going back to our garden analogy, let’s say that in the past you could plant one seed every inch; but today, the garden authorities (or regulators) are saying that in order to preserve seeds you can only plant one every five inches. In financial terms, regulators are requiring banks to hold greater capital reserves (money for a rainy day) and are thus reducing the amount of money they can borrow. In the past, a bank may have had $10, and regulators only required them to hold onto $1 in case of an emergency. At that time, banks also had the ability to leverage their money 20x. That meant they could generate $180 in loans ($9 multiplied by 20). Today, banks may have $10 in capital but need to hold onto $3, and can only leverage the money 10x. This means they can only generate $70 in loans. With bad loans (or “bad seeds”) on the balance sheet they are mostly focused on “getting back to even” – not focused on lending to new businesses or generating future revenue.

So what does it mean for the TILE Community? Well first, if you and your financial advisor determine that saving (or growing) your money is a good idea, then do it! At the same time, be conscious of the amount in each account (is it more than the $250,000 maximum insured against bank failure by the FDIC?), where it is (a large or small institution), and the expected return. Second, if you are looking to get a loan (and it doesn’t have to be for a vegetable garden), it may be tough out there. Since many smaller banks are overwhelmed by dealing with so many bad loans, they’re still hesitant to lend. But if you have a project or a business idea you really believe in, be persistent. Your time and energy may be the best investment of all.

- Amy